# Overview & Basic Approach

## Overview

The general approach of Caterpillar was that of the zoom-in technique adopted by many other groups, albeit with a few differences. we performed a much, much larger search for optimal computer parameters to ensure that contamination volumes are as large as possible without great cost. We also implemented iterative unbinding in `ROCKSTAR` which we found to be critical in identifying halos at the highest resolution simulations, particularly on highly radial orbits.

![Caterpillar halos were drawn from a parent simulation and re-simulated at high resolution.](/files/-LeT6dFdnstBIBeUAiPz)

## Considerations

### Volume

The volume of the parent simulation was selected to be 100 Mpc/h as this allows for roughly \~6500 Milky Way-sized (i.e. 10^12 Msol) systems to be found. After a gentle selection over local environment (i.e. making sure no halos were near clusters) 2122 candidates were used to select *Caterpillar* candidates.

### Mass Resolution

We required a resolution which allowed us to resolve $$10^{12} M\_\odot$$ halos with 10,000 particles so as to construct well defined lagrangian volumes. This resulted in us selecting a resolution of 1024^3 or a particle mass of $$8.72 \times 10^{12} M\_\odot/h$$ .

### Halo Selection

We selected halos with the following environmental requirements:

* halos between 0.7 - 3 x 1012 \\(M\_:raw-latex:odot\\) (6564 candidates)
* no halos larger than 7 x 1013 \\(M\_:raw-latex:odot\\) within 7 Mpc
* no halos larger than 7 x 1012 \\(M\_:raw-latex:odot\\) within 2.8 Mpc (2122 candidates)

This is roughly in line with Tollerud et al. (2012), Boylan-Kolchin et al. (2013), Fardal et al. (2013), Pfiffel et al. (2013), Li & White (2008), van der Marel et al. (2012), Karachentsev et al. (2004) and Tikhonov & Klypin (2009). This avoids Milky Way-sized systems near clusters but does not make them overly isolated necessarily. Halos were also selected to not be preferentially near the very edge of the simulation volume as a matter of convenience. The first 24 *Caterpillar* halos are highlighted within the parent volume below.

### Temporal Resolution

The time steps were set to be log of the expansion factor, following a similar convention to that used by the *Millenium* and *Millenium-II* simulations. The following table shows the various measures for time/size at each snapshot.

## Halo Properties

{% hint style="info" %}
Nearly all of the following can be found in our flagship paper [Griffen et al. (2015)](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/10/pdf).
{% endhint %}

### Halo Profiles

![](/files/-LeT98E6qzWFBq0mFQqx)

### Accretion History

Lower Resolution Runs

![](/files/-LeT944MyHmSvbmxVUko)

### Subhalos

![](/files/-LeT9BftFTd6EWcU1P43)

### Convergence

![](/files/-LeTC3FZKSLKJi6lq8oh)

![](/files/-LeT9mNgFu0tUjHB0ExQ)

### Mass-Concentration

![](/files/-LeTA1m70jKTSnlia5zd)

### Relaxed

![](/files/-LeT7FZXBR5y3t-jZ3eO)

### Lower Resolution Runs

![](/files/-LeT9XW_8403-p2oWMvg)

![](/files/-LeT9UUgnvQrtEHwME8s)


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.caterpillarproject.org/technical/basic-approach.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.